Dismissed¶21

R.Ramesh Rajah v. Virudhunagar Hindu Tholandi

Madras HC8 Jan 2025SA(MD)/472/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.A.(MD)No.472 of 2004; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; dismissed for default; second appeal under Section 100 CPC; appellant absent, no representation; no costs; R.Ramesh Rajah v. Virudhunagar Hindu Tholandi Nadar Sangam and Mohan Rajes; against A.S.No.24 of 2003 (Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court, Virudhunagar, judgment dated 27.10.2003) reversing O.S.No.145 of 2000 (District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar, decree dated 21.01.2003); decided 08.01.2025 by V.Sivagnanam J.; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

The Second Appeal was dismissed for default because there was no representation on the side of the appellant and the appellant remained absent for the second time when the matter was taken up for hearing; no costs were awarded. No substantive issue was adjudicated on merits. ¶21

R.Ramesh Rajah Vs Virudhunagar Hindu Tholandi — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.(MD)No.472 of 2004

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

S.A.(MD)No.472 of 2004

¶7

R.Ramesh Rajah ...1^st Defendant/1^st Respondent/Appellant

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.Virudhunagar Hindu Tholandi Nadar Sangam, Rep. by its Secretary T.K.S.P.Arunachala Nadar. ...Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent

¶10

2.Mohan Rajes ...2^nd Defendant/2^nd Respondent/Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment dated 27.10.2003 in A.S.No.24 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court, Virudhunagar reversing the Judgment and Decree, dated 21.01.2003 in O.S.No.145 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.

¶12

For Appellants : No appearance

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.D.Nallathambi for R1

¶14

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

S.A.(MD)No.472 of 2004

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated 27.10.2003 in A.S.No.24 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court, Virudhunagar reversing the Judgment and Decree, dated 21.01.2003 in O.S.No.145 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.

¶20

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. The appellant remained absent for the second time.

¶21

3.In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No

¶22

costs.

¶23

08.01.2025 2/2

¶24

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Page 2 of 3