Manoharan, v. Karthikeyan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal (S.A.(MD)) dismissed for non-prosecution where plaintiff-appellant's advocate reported 'no instructions'; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan; decided 03.04.2025; appeal under Section 100 C.P.C. against A.S.No.53 of 2011 (Sub Court, Kulithalai) decree confirming O.S.No.266 of 2005 (District Munsif Court, Kulithalai); no costs; connected C.M.P(MD)No.11134 of 2018 closed; parties: Manoharan (appellant/plaintiff) v. Karthikeyan, Kangadharan, Mahalakshmi, Thamarai, Maheswari (respondents/defendants); counsel G.Sridharan for appellant, no appearance for respondents.
What did the court decide?
Upon the appellant's counsel reporting 'no instructions' (having received neither instructions nor any reply from the client or the instruction counsel despite a registered letter), the court recorded the report and dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution without costs, closing the connected miscellaneous petition C.M.P(MD)No.11134 of 2018.