Second appeal concerning a property dispute was dismissed as abated after both counsel reported the appellant's death, with liberty to the legal heirs to seek restoration if circumstances warrant.
Appeal dismissed as abated; legal heirs permitted to restore the appeal if circumstances warrant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.386 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
S.A.(MD)No.386 of 2018 and
C.M.P(MD)No.10971 of 2018
S.Krishnan
... Appellant
Vs.
Prayer: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 29.06.2018 made in A.S.No.40 of 2012, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 12.07.2012 made in O.S.No.104 of 2009, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Ramanathapuram.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavan For R1 & R2 : Mr.J.Barathan
1/4
S.A.(MD)No.386 of 2018
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by both the learned counsel that the appellant died and hence, there is no necessity for further adjudication in the second appeal.
03.04.2025
NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm
2/4
S.A.(MD)No.386 of 2018
To
3/4
S.A.(MD)No.386 of 2018
K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
rgm
S.A.(MD)No.386 of 2018 and C.M.P(MD)No.10971 of 2018
03.04.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Krishnan
S.Bharathirajan
S.Nagarajan
K.K. Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
