A.Selvamony v. M.Jeyamoni
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent decrees; both the sole appellant and sole respondent had died and no steps were taken within limitation, so the appeal was dismissed as abated with no costs.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated; no costs.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.1140 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.(MD)No.1140 of 2005
A.Selvamony ...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant
-Vs-
M.Jeyamoni ...Defendant/Respondent/Respondent
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated passed in A.S.No.11 of 2004, dated 05.07.2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.12.2003 passed in O.S.No.88 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District Munsiff, Padmanabhapuram.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Devaraj For Respondent : Mr.K.N.Thampi
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.Selvamony
- respondent
M.Jeyamoni
Coram
V.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court