Dismissed¶¶21

Virudambal v. Padmini

Madras HC1 Sept 2025SA/766/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.A.No.766 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.14857 of 2019; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Justice K. Rajasekar; decision dated 01.09.2025; Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed. Appellants: Virudambal, Selvam Angammal (died), Murugesan (no appearance). Respondents: Padmini (counsel N. Manokaran), Ramadoss (died). Impugned: judgment/decree dated 25.01.2019 in A.S.No.57 of 2014 (Sub Court, Kallakurichi) reversing decree dated 08.07.2014 in O.S.No.240 of 2007 (Principal District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi). No merits discussed; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

None. The Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs was made; the connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P.No.14857 of 2019) was closed. ¶¶21

Virudambal Vs Padmini — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.No.766 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 01.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

S.A.No.766 of 2019 and

¶7

C.M.P.No.14857 of 2019

¶8

1.Virudambal 2.Selvam Angammal (died) 3.Murugesan ... Appellants Vs. 1.Padmini 2.Ramadoss ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and the decree dated 25.01.2019 made in A.S.No.57 of 2014 on the file of the Sub Court, Kallakurichi, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 08.07.2014 made in O.S.No.240 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi.

¶10

For Appellants : No appearance For R1 : Mr.N.Manokaran For R2 : Died

¶11

1/4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

S.A.No.766 of 2019

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

It is reported by the learned counsel for the first respondent that,

¶16

despite his best efforts, he was unable to obtain instructions from the client

¶17

regarding the steps to be taken in respect of the deceased second respondent.

¶18

This Court had already recorded the same submission on an earlier occasion and adjourned the matter finally.

¶19

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the first respondent reiterated the same submission, and there was also no representation on behalf of the appellants.

¶20

In view of the fact that the matter has been pending without any

¶21

progress, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶22

01.09.2025

¶23

ssi Index : Yes / No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

S.A.No.766 of 2019

¶27

To: