S.v.Mydeen Pichai&Another. v. Laila Beevi
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a title suit dismissed for default as appellants had no representation on the listing date or the dismissal date.
Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a title suit dismissed for default as appellants had no representation on the listing date or the dismissal date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.No.1616 of 2003 and C.M.P.No.14816 of 2003
1.S.V.Mydeen Pichai
2.Santhu Beevi
...Defendants 4 & 5/Appellants/Appellants
Vs.
15.Shakeela Banu (Respondents 10 to 15 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 6th respondent vide Court order dated 31.01.2024, made in MP(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2007, in S.A.No.1616 of 2003)
...Plaintiffs & Defendants 1 to 3/
Respondents/Respondents
1/3
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgement and decree of the Principal Sub Judge, Tenkasi, dated 25.02.2003 in A.S.No.18 of 2002, confirming the Judgement and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tenkasi, dated 01.08.2001, in O.S.No.514 of 1989.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : M/s.S.Ramesh @ Ramiah for R12, R14 & R15 No appearance for R10, R11 and R13
JUDGMENT
When the matter was listed on 11.07.2025, there is no representation on
the side of the appellants. Hence, it it listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellants.
2.Accordingly, this Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.
14.07.2025
NCC: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No RJR
2/3
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
RJR
To
2.The learned Principal District Munsif, Tenkasi.
Copy to:- The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.A.No.1616 of 2003 and C.M.P.No.14816 of 2003
14.07.2025
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.V.Mydeen Pichai
Santhu Beevi
Laila Beevi
Noorjehan Beevi
Mumtaj Beevi
Mahuthal Beevi
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court