P.Geetha v. M.Saravanan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Contempt Petition, the Court addressed an alleged violation of an order directing the second respondent to afford the petitioner an opportunity before passing orders. The respondent had rejected the request without a hearing. The Court directed the respondent to consider a fresh representation and pass afresh orders within four weeks without necessitating a personal hearing, subsequently c
What did the court decide?
Injunction is lifted; direction given to the second respondent to consider the fresh representation and pass orders afresh within four weeks without a personal hearing.