Dismissed¶¶39

L.Nagaraj v. S.Harikrishnan

Madras HC26 Feb 2025REV.APLW/178/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; Review Application (Writ) No.178 of 2024; review of writ order dated 09.07.2024 in W.P.No.18948 of 2024; Order XLVII Rule-1 r/w Section 114 Code of Civil Procedure; apparent error on the face of the record; third-party review applicant; feeder category promotion; post of Superintendent; Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University, Karapakkam; fresh notification to fill vacancies; communication dated 25.11.2024 disclaiming claim under writ order; Review Application dismissed; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs; G.K. Ilanthiraiyan J.

What did the court decide?

No relief to the review applicants; connected miscellaneous petitions (W.M.P.Nos.31600 & 31601 of 2024) closed; no order as to costs. ¶¶39

L.Nagaraj Vs S.Harikrishnan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Rev. Appln(W) No.178 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26.02.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Review Application (Writ) No.178 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.31600 & 31601 of 2024

¶7

L.Nagaraj

¶8

P.Balachandar

¶9

R.Chirakala

¶10

D.Jayakumar

¶11

R.Kanimozhi

¶12

V.S.Priyaa

¶13

... Petitioners

¶14

Vs.

¶15

S.Harikrishnan

¶16

M.R.Prasad

¶17

A.Soundara Pandiyan

¶18

The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶19

The Syndicate,

¶20

Tamil Nadu Teacher's Education University, Karapakkam, Chennai – 600 097.

¶21

The Vice Chancellor, Tamil Nadu Teacher's Education University, Karapakkam, Chennai – 600 097.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Page 1 of 4

¶24

Rev. Appln(W) No.178 of 2024

¶25

The Registrar,

¶26

Tamil Nadu Teacher's Education University, Karapakkam,

¶27

Chennai – 600 097.

¶28

... Respondents

¶29

Prayer : Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule-1 r/w Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, to review the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.18949 of 2024 dated 09.07.2024.

¶30

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Sankaran Senior Counsel For Mr.A.Maheshnath For Respondents For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyas

¶31

ORDER

¶32

This petition has been filed to review the order dated 09.07.2024

¶33

passed by this Court in W.P.No.18948 of 2024, thereby directing the sixth respondent to take appropriate steps to fill up the vacancies to the post of Superintendent in the Tamilnadu Teachers Education University, Karapakkam, Chennai, as per the statutes by issuance of fresh notification, within a period of twelve weeks.

¶34

The petitioners are third parties and they are also claiming promotion to the post of Superintendent, since they are in the feeder category. This Court by an order dated 09.07.2024 directed the sixth respondent to take

¶35

appropriate steps to fill up the vacancies to the post of Superintendent in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4

¶36

Rev. Appln(W) No.178 of 2024

¶37

Tamilnadu Teachers Education University, Karapakkam, Chennai. To review the said order, the present Review Application has been filed by the petitioner.

¶38

It is seen that after the order passed by this Court, the respondents 1 to 3, who are the petitioners in the writ petition in W.P.No.18948 of 2024, has sent communication dated 25.11.2024 that they will not claim the above Court order for further process. Therefore, the petitioners case of the promotion will be considered for the post of Superintendent. This Court finds no apparent error on the face of records as such the petitioners failed to make any grounds to review the order passed by this Court. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court finds no merits in this Review Application to review the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 18948 of 2024.

¶39