Dismissed¶4

K.S.Ramaiah v. Tirupathi

Madras HC26 Feb 2025WMP(MD)/1420/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court 26.02.2025, W.M.P(MD).No.1420 of 2025 (G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J.): leave under Section 151 CPC to review the Court's 09.01.2025 order in W.P.(MD).No.784 of 2025 (registration of settlement deed without parent document, reversing Sub Registrar Shengottai's 02.01.2025 refusal) denied; applicant K.S.Ramaiah not a party to writ petition, claim of prior sale agreement/original title deed rejected; WMP dismissed and Review Application rejected at SR stage; advised civil Court route.

What did the court decide?

Leave to file the review petition cannot be granted. ¶4

K.S.Ramaiah Vs Tirupathi — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WMP.(MD) No.1420 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26.02.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.M.P(MD).No.1420 of 2025 in Review Application (Writ)(MD) SR. No.5795 of 2025

¶7

K.S.Ramaiah ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.Tirupathi 2. The Sub Registrar, Shengottai, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer : Petition filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, to grant leave permitting the petitioner to file the review petition.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.G.Shankarganesh

¶12

For Respondents For R2 : Mr.S.Vinodh Government Advocate

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This petition has been filed to grant leave permitting the petitioner to

¶15

file the review petition to review the order dated 09.01.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.784 of 2025.

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WMP.(MD) No.1420 of 2025

¶19

The main writ petition has been filed by the first respondent challenging the order passed by the second respondent dated 02.01.2025, thereby refused to register the settlement deed executed by the petitioner in favour of his wife on the ground that the first respondent failed to produce the original parent document in respect of the subject property. This Court by an order dated 09.01.2025, directed the registering authority to register the settlement deed without insisting upon production of the parent documents while registration.

¶20

According to the petitioner, the petitioner had entered into the

¶21

agreement for sale with the original owner of the property and he has original title deed. Suppressing the said fact, the first respondent approached this Court and obtained order.

¶22

It is seen that the petitioner is no way connected with the writ petition and he was not a party in the writ petition. If he has any grievance over the original owner of the property, he can very well approach the civil Court for appropriate relief.

¶23

Page 2 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

WMP.(MD) No.1420 of 2025

¶26