Dismissed¶27

The State of Tamilnadu, v. M.Murugamani

Madras HC13 Nov 2025REV.APLC(MD)/82/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Rev.Aplc.(MD) No.82 of 2021 and CMP(MD) No.7251 of 2021; State of Tamil Nadu and others v. M.Murugamani; review application under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 CPC against judgment dated 25.08.2020 in WA(MD) No.353 of 2020; pensionary benefits; 50% part-time service; G.O.Ms.No.194 dated 12.09.2018; WP(MD) No.16252/2019 allowed on 28.11.2019 relying on WP No.14365/2014; WA No.882/2017 batch dated 06.04.2018; WA No.517/2020 batch dated 13.08.2020; grounds of review sought reargument; benefits already disbursed; Review Application dismissed, no costs; Coram: C.V. Karthikeyan and R. Vijayakumar, JJ. (order by R. Vijayakumar, J.); dated 13.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

A perusal of the grounds of review shows that the review applicants have merely sought to reargue the writ appeal. ¶26

The State of Tamilnadu, Vs M.Murugamani — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Rev.Aplc.(MD) No.82 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 13.11.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

Rev. Aplc.(MD) No.82 of 2021 and CMP(MD) No.7251 of 2021

¶7

1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary School Education Department (Pa.Ka.7-1) Fort St. George, Chennai 09

¶8

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 06

¶9

3.The District Educational Officer, Uthamapalayam Educational District Uthamapalayam, Theni District 625533

¶10

... Review Applicants/Appellants

¶11

¶12

M.Murugamani ... Respondent

¶13

PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 of the code of Civil Procedure to review the judgment dated 25.08.2020 in WA(MD) No.353 of 2020.

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Omprakash

¶15

Government Advocate

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Rev.Aplc.(MD) No.82 of 2021

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.)

¶21

The Review Application has been preferred by the appellants in WA (MD) No.353/2020 seeking to review the judgment passed by the Coordiante Bench on 25.08.2020.

¶22

The respondent in the review application had preferred WP(MD) No.16252/2019 seeking to quash the G.O.Ms.No.194 dated 12.09.2018 and the consequential order in February 2019 and to direct the authorities to take into consideration 50% of the part time services rendered by the petitioner for reckoning the pensionary benefits. This writ petition came to be allowed on 28.11.2019 relying upon the order passed in WP No. 14365/2014 etc. This order was put to challenge by the State in WA(MD) No.353/2020. A coordinate Bench of this Court had dismissed the writ appeal on 25.08.2020 relying upon the order passed in WA No.882/2017 batch cases dated 06.04.2018 and another batch in WA No.517/2020 dated 13.08.2020.

¶23

_____________ Page 2 of 4_

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Rev.Aplc.(MD) No.82 of 2021

¶26

A perusal of the grounds of review reveals that the applicants have sought to reargue the writ appeal. That apart, the benefits as sought by the writ petitioner in WP(MD) No.16252/2019 have already been

¶27

disbursed. In the said circumstances, we do not find any merit in the review application. Accordingly, the Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶28

[C.V.K., J.] [R.V., J.]

¶29

05.11.2025

¶30

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No RR

¶31

To:

¶32

1.The Principal Secretary School Education Department (Pa.Ka.7-1) Fort St. George, Chennai 09

¶33

2.The Director of School Education, College Road Chennai 06