B.Selvakumar v. S.Balan
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal Suit dismissed for non-prosecution as neither appellant nor respondents appeared on two listing dates. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
A.S.(MD)No.174 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 13.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
A.S.(MD)No.174 of 2017
B.Selvakumar ... Appellant
-vs-
1.S.Balan 2.K.R.Periyasamy 3.C.Pakkirisamy ... Respondents
PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 41 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2017 made in O.S.No.97 of 2014 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Palani, Dindigul District.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : No Appearance
_____________ Page 1 of 4_
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B.Selvakumar
- respondent
S.Balan
- respondent
K.R.Periyasamy
- respondent
C.Pakkirisamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court