Disposed

Chennai Ananda Bhavan, v. M/S.Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets and Snacks

Madras HC21 Mar 2025OSA(CAD)/144/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal concerning use of a name/label/logo was disposed of on the basis of a signed memorandum of compromise dated 12.03.2025. The Court recorded the settlement and clarified it had not certified approval of the name or label proposed by the appellant.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in terms of compromise; interim applications closed; no order as to costs.

Chennai Ananda Bhavan, Vs M/S.Adyar Ananda Bhavan… — Intellectual Property | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

OSA (CAD) No.144 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 21.03.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶7

OSA(CAD) No.144 of 2021 and CMP Nos.20922 of 2021 and CMP Nos.18382 & 18387 of 2024

¶8

Chennai Ananda Bhavan Kinfra P.O. Muringoor Koratti, Cochin-Thrissur Highway NH-47, Thrissur- 680 309 .. Appellant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

M/s.Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets & Snacks Represented by its partner K.T.Venkatesan, Muthulakshmi Bhavan, No.9, M.G.Road, Shastri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai -600 020 .. Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Appeal under Order 13(1) of Commercial Court Act of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 04.08.2021 in application No.2178 of 2021 in C.S.No.982 of 2017 passed

¶12

Page 1 of 6

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

OSA (CAD) No.144 of 2021

¶15

justice.

¶16

by this Court, and consequently allow the original side appeal and render justice.

¶17

For Appellant : Mr.V.S.Kishore Kumar For Respondent : Ms.Mithreyi Kasthurirangan for Mr.K.Harishankar

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶20

The parties tender a memorandum of compromise dated 12.03.2025,

¶21

which is signed by the parties and their respective advocates. Counsel for appellant and counsel for respondent identified the signature of appellant and partner of respondent. The same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. For ease of reference, the same is scanned and reproduced below:

¶22

___________ Page 2 of 6_

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

OSA (CAD) No.144 of 2021

¶25

__________
Page 3 of 6

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

OSA (CAD) No.144 of 2021

¶28

___________ Page 4 of 6_

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

OSA (CAD) No.144 of 2021

¶31

Appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

Consequently, interim applications also stand closed.

¶33

We clarify that this Court has not certified the name or label or logo proposed to be used by appellant has our approval.

¶34

The compromise is taken on record, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

¶35

(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J.) 21.03.2025

¶36

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶37

mrn

¶38

___________ Page 5 of 6_

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

OSA (CAD) No.144 of 2021

¶41

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J.

¶42

(mrn)

¶43

OSACAD) No.144 of 2021 and CMP Nos.20922 of 2021 and CMP Nos.18382 & 18387 of 2024

¶44

21.03.2025

¶45

___________ Page 6 of 6_

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Chennai Ananda Bhavan, v. M/S.Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets and Snacks

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chennai Ananda Bhavan, v. M/S.Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets and Snacks

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Private Limited, Vs the Authorised Officer

Umamageshwari Vs the District Collector

P.Dharmaraj Vs the District Collector

The Joint Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise Vs Titan Company Ltd.

S.S. Rajkumar Vs M/S. Industrial Venture Capital Ltd.

Minor Harin, Vs The Authorised Officer