Dismissed¶21

M/S.Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Private Limited, v. the Authorised Officer

Madras HC20 Mar 2025WP/20100/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No.20100 of 2024, Madras High Court, decided 20.03.2025 by K.R.Shriram, CJ. Petitioner M/s.Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. (Director G.R.Harshavardhan) sought mandamus under Article 226 against the Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank, Udumelpet Branch, for a detailed/itemised statement of account of appropriation of Rs.10,68,18,741.66 paid after demand notice towards principal, interest and charges (request letter dated 08.03.2024). Counsel: B.Siva Kollapan for B.Ramachandran (petitioner); M.L.Ganesh (respondent). Petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; interim application WMP No.21996 of 2024 disposed of. No merits decision; no precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the petition; no order as to costs. ¶21

M/S.Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Private Limited, Vs the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No.20100 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20.03.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶8

WP No.20100 of 2024 and WMP No.21996 of 2024

¶9

M/s.Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. rep.by its Director G.R.Harshavardhan S/o.G. Raveendran having its registered office at 1^st Floor, 132, Palani Road Venkatesa Mills Post, Udumalpet 642 128 Tiruppur District : Petitioner

¶10

¶11

The Authorised Officer Indian Overseas Bank Udumelpet Branch Sri Shanmugapriya Vidhyasagar Road Udumelpet-642126 Tiruppur district. : Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent to furnish a detailed statement of accounts specifying the manner in which the payments made by petitioner after issuance of demand notice ie. Rs.10,68,18,741.66 have been appropriated, including an itemized breakdown of the application of

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

WP No.20100 of 2024

¶16

each payment towards principal, interest and any other charges as requested by the petitioner vide its letter dated 08.03.2024.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Siva Kollapan, for Mr.B.Ramachandran For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ganesh

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶20

Learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

¶21

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There will be no order as to

¶22

costs. Consequently, interim application also stands disposed of.

¶23

(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.) 20.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar

¶24

Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

WP No.20100 of 2024

¶27

¶28

The Authorised Officer Indian Overseas Bank Udumelpet Branch Sri Shanmugapriya Vidhyasagar Road Udumelpet-642126 Tiruppur District.

¶29

Page 3 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

WP No.20100 of 2024

¶32

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶33

AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

(tar)

WP No.20100 of 2024

20.03.2025

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/S.Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Private Limited, v. the Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Private Limited, v. the Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Encore Asset Reconstruction Vs R.Suresh Kumar

S.Rangasamy (Deceased) Vs Authorised Officer

N. Krishnappa Vs the Authorised Officer

S.Lakshmiprabu Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

S.Ezhilarasan Vs the Chief Election Commissioner of India

Umamageshwari Vs the District Collector