M.Prakash v. Dharani N v
Case brief
What is this about?
O.P. No. 109 of 2025; Additional Master IV, High Court of Madras; deposition/chief examination dated 29.04.2026; PW1 Mr. M. Prakash, party-in-person; Ex.P13 printout of Aadhaar updated history of respondent; objection (personal document; mobile phone; alleged theft); exhibit marked subject to proof and admissibility; no holdings, statutes or cases cited.
What did the court decide?
Ex.P13 marked as exhibit, subject to proof and admissibility, notwithstanding the respondent's objection; no adjudicatory relief granted or denied in this record. ¶¶12
What the court decided
BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL MASTER IV, HIGH COURT, MADRAS OP.No. 109 OF 2025
Date : 29.04.2026 Time : 11.50 A.M.
Name : Mr. M. Prakash (PW1)
Continuation of Chief Examination by Mr. M. Prakash, Party-in-Person. Solemnly affirmed:
In continuation of the chief examination, the following document is
marked as exhibit.
Ex.P13 is the printout of the Aadhaar updated history of the respondent.
(The same is objected by the counsel for the respondent that it is
respondent's personal document and it is taken from the respondent's
mobile phone which is an offence of theft.) The witness adds: The mobile number was that of the witness / petitioner who is none other but the
husband of the respondent. With these objections, subject to proof and
admissibility, Ex.P13 is marked.
Procedural history
How this case reached the court
- Prior proceeding
Record is a continuation of the chief examination of Mr. M. Prakash (PW1), who appears as party-in-person.¶¶4
- Prior proceeding
A document was tendered in continuation of the chief examination to be marked as an exhibit; Ex.P13 is identified as the printout of the Aadhaar updated history of the respondent.¶¶7
- Prior proceeding
Counsel for the respondent objected to the marking, contending the document is the respondent's personal document taken from the respondent's mobile phone, characterised as an offence of theft.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court