Blue Pearl Development Private Limited v. Tamil Nadu Congress Committee Charitable Trust and three others

Madras HC7 Jul 2025OA/512/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Blue Pearl Development Private Ltd; Tamil Nadu Congress Committee Charitable Trust; Sudarshan Nachiappan; K.Selvaperunthagai; Narayanan; Section 9(1)(ii)(d) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules; ad-interim injunction; interim protection; schedule property; peaceful possession and enjoyment; ingress and egress; pending arbitration; endorsement; infructuous; lost possession; dismissed as infructuous; no costs; Abdul Quddhose; Madras High Court; O.A. No. 512 of 2025; 07.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of the endorsement by counsel for the applicant that the relief sought in the original application has become infructuous (the applicant having already lost possession), the application is dismissed as infructuous, with no costs. ¶24-25

Blue Pearl Development Private Limited Vs Tamil Nadu Congress… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

O.A. No. 512 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07.07.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

Original Application No. 512 of 2025

¶7

Blue Pearl Development Private Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director No.2 & 3 Bishop Wallers Avenue Mylapore, Chennai-600004. … Applicant

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1. Tamil Nadu Congress Committee Charitable Trust Rep. by its Trustees Having its registered office at Kamaraj Bhavan, 573 and 574 Mount Road, Anna Salai Chennai-600006.

¶10

2. Sudarshan Nachiappan

¶11

3. K.Selvaperunthagai

¶12

4. Narayanan … Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Original Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to grant an order of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents, their men, agents, or anyone acting through or under from in any manner disturbing the applicant's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property including restraining

¶14

1/3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

O.A. No. 512 of 2025

¶17

the applicants ingress and egress from the schedule property pending disposal of the Arbitration.

¶18

For Applicant : Mr.V.Prakash, Senior Counsel Asst. by Gautham S.Raman

¶19

For Respondents : Dr.Abhishek Singhvi, Senior Counsel Mr.Sathish Parasaran, Senior Counsel Mr.Sricharan Rangarajan, Senior Counsel Mr.Aman Panwar Mr.Vishnu Mohan Mr. Akash Panwar Mr.Gautham Bajaj For Mr.V.S.Venkatesh & (R1 & R3) Mr.K.Balasubramanian Mr.S.Jayashima (R2) Mr.V.Z.Victor

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The learned counsel for the applicant has made an endorsement in

¶22

the Court bundle stating that the relief sought in this original application

¶23

has become infructuous, since the petitioner has already lost possession.

¶24

2. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as infructuous. No

¶25

costs.