Dismissed¶24

Puyalraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

Habeas Corpus – Madurai Bench of Madras High Court – H.C.P.(MD) No.315 of 2025

Madras HC12 Mar 2025HCP(MD)/315/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas corpus petition (H.C.P.(MD) No.315 of 2025, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 12.03.2025) filed by Puyalraj, father of detenue Sathana (aged about 18 years), against the State of Tamil Nadu through the Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, and the Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Kumbakonam, seeking production and release of his daughter under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the petitioner withdrew the petition with an endorsement before any adjudication; the Bench of Dr. G. Jayachandran and R. Poornima, JJ., dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No merits decided, no precedent value.

What the court decided

Puyalraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

H.C.P.(MD) No.315 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.03.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA

¶7

H.C.P.(MD)No.315 of 2025

¶8

Puyalraj

¶9

... Petitioner/ father of the Detenue

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶12

2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the 1^st and 2^nd respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu who is the petitioner's daughter namely Sathana, D/o.Puyalraj, aged about 18 years before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

H.C.P.(MD) No.315 of 2025

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Geetha For R1 & R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya prabahar Additional Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

¶20

AND

¶21

R.POORNIMA , J.

¶22

When the matter came up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the

¶23

petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶24

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counel for the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶25

[G.J., J.] & [R.P., J.] 12.03.2025

¶26

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Ns

¶27

Page 2 of 4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

H.C.P.(MD) No.315 of 2025

¶30

¶31

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶32

2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶33

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

Page 3 of 4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

H.C.P.(MD) No.315 of 2025

¶37

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

¶38

AND R.POORNIMA , J.

¶39

¶40

H.C.P.(MD)No.315 of 2025

¶41

12.03.2025

¶42

Page 4 of 4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Puyalraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Puyalraj v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satya.S Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Kumareshan Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajakumari Vs The State of Tamilnadu

A. Sevuga Perumal Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Rajeshwari Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

N.Natarajan Munisamy Vs The Government of India