A.Joseph Raj v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Plaintiffs filed Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking expedition of pending applications and suit pending before the Trial Court. Directions were issued to dispose of applications within one month and the suit within five months.
What did the court decide?
Trial court to dispose of I.A. Nos. 9 and 10 of 2024 by 30.06.2025 and dispose of the suit by 30.11.2025.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.687 & 688 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.03.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.687 & 688 of 2025
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.687 of 2025
A.Joseph Raj ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.The Commissioner, The Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Trichy.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Ariyamangalam Division, The Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Trichy.
... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants 2 & 3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned Principal District Munsif Judge is directed to expedite disposal of interlocutory applications and the suit itself?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Joseph Raj
- respondent
The Commissioner, The Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Trichy
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Ariyamangalam Division, The Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Trichy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court