Disposed¶32

Arumugam (Died), 1. M. Somasundaram, v. P.R. Subbiah

Madras HC15 Dec 2025CRP(MD)/258/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; N. Senthilkumar J.; C.R.P.(MD)No.258 of 2023 with C.M.P.(MD)No.1207 of 2023; civil revision under Article 227 Constitution of India; challenge to order dated 29.08.2022 in I.A.No.6 of 2022 in O.S.No.26 of 2019, District Munsif Devakottai; revision closed as nothing survived, underlying suit dismissed for default on 15.10.2025; no adjudication on merits; petitioners Arumugam (died), M. Somasundaram, S.P. Madhavan, S. Murugan; respondents P.R. Subbiah, M. Ramanathan, P.R. Kalimuthu, M. Karuppiah, District Collector/RDO/Tahsildar Sivagangai, Meenal, Paarvathi.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief granted; the Civil Revision Petition and the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition were closed, nothing surviving for adjudication after the suit O.S.No.26 of 2019 was dismissed for default. ¶32

Arumugam (Died), 1. M. Somasundaram, Vs P.R. Subbiah — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.258 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.258 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1207 of 2023

Arumugam (Died)

1.M.Somasundaram

2.S.P.Madhavan

3.S.Murugan .. Petitioners

Vs.

1.P.R.Subbiah

2.M.Ramanathan

3.P.R.Kalimuthu

4.M.Karuppiah

5.The District Collector, Sivagangai District.

¶17

6.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

C.R.P.(MD)No.258 of 2023

¶21

7.The Tahsildar, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

8.Meenal

9.Paarvathi

.. Respondents

Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the fair and decreetal order dated 29.08.2022 passed in I.A.No.6 of 2022 in O.S.No.26 of 2019 on the file of the District Munsif, Devakottai, and to set aside the same.

¶26

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Anandkumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Narayanan For R5 to R7 : Mr.F.Deepak Special Government Pleader R4, R8, & R9 : Tapal Refused

¶27

JUDGMENT

¶28

When the matter is taken up for hearing today (15.12.2025), the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the suit in O.S. No.26 of 2019 was dismissed for default on 15.10.2025. As the suit itself has been dismissed, nothing further remains for adjudication in the present petition.

¶29

2/4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

C.R.P.(MD)No.258 of 2023

¶32