Dismissed¶25

C. Wilson v. S. Navaneetha Krishnan

Madras HC15 Dec 2025CRP(MD)/229/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP(MD) No.229 of 2023, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 15/12/2025 by Justice N. Senthilkumar. C. Wilson v. S. Navaneetha Krishnan and N. Ramesh. Civil revision under Article 227 Constitution of India against dismissal of I.A.No.4 of 2022 in O.S.No.531 of 2021 (II nd Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli); application under Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151 CPC for advocate commissioner regarding electricity service connection; held advocate commissioner cannot be permitted for collection of evidence; revision dismissed, no costs.

What did the court decide?

None; the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed with no costs. ¶25

C. Wilson Vs S. Navaneetha Krishnan — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRP(MD). No.229 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 15/12/2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶6

CRP(MD). No.229 of 2023

¶7

C. Wilson ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

S. Navaneetha Krishnan, 2. N.Ramesh ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER :-

¶11

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to allow this civil revision petition by setting aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2022 in O.S.No.531 of 2021 dated 24-11-2022 on the file of the II nd Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s.K.R.Manimaran, Advocate.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to allow this civil revision

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CRP(MD). No.229 of 2023

¶18

petition by setting aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2022 in O.S.No.531 of 2021 dated 24-11-2022 on the file of the II nd Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.531 of 2021 against the respondents herein. In that suit, he has taken out an application in I.A.No.4 of 2022 under Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151 of CPC, seeking appointment of advocate commissioner to identify whether there is an electricity connection stands in the name of the petitioner. The trial court has dismissed the same, taking into consideration that service connection has to be examined by proper evidence and such evidence cannot be taken into consideration by an appointment of Advocate Commissioner.

¶20

The reasons given by the trial court needs more interference as

¶21

the same was considered on merits and an advocate commissioner cannot be permitted for collection of evidence.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

CRP(MD). No.229 of 2023

¶25

For the aforesaid reasons, I do not find any merits in this Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶26

15.12.2025 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no

¶27

pnn

¶28

¶29