Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order of the II Additional District Court, Madurai was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel made an endorsement that nothing remained for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.2238 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2238 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD)No.10476 of 2022
Arun Veerakumar
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition - filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed by the II Addiitional District Court, Madurai in I.A.No.2 of 2017 in A.S.No.8 of 2015 on 27.03.2018 and allow the present Civil Revision Petition.
1/3
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.2238 of 2022
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prabhu For Respondents : No Appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the prayer sought in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and nothing remains to be further considered in this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court record.
2.Recording the same, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
07.08.2025
NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes / No ta To
1.The II Additional District Court, Madurai.
2/3
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.2238 of 2022
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
ta
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2238 of 2022
07.08.2025
3/3
Arun Veerakumar
Poongodi
Kaveri
Thagathambi
Padmavathi
Porselvi
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
