Civil revision petition against an interlocutory order in a pending suit was dismissed for non-prosecution, as neither petitioners nor their counsel appeared despite the matter being listed under caption 'for dismissal' on three dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD). No.221 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 27/06/2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
CRP (MD). No.221 of 2021
Vs
1/4
CRP(MD). No.221 of 2021
PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and Decreetal order passed in I.A.No.288 of 2018 in O.S.No.720 of 2016 on the file of the 3rd Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli dated 21.12.2018.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Kathiravan for R5 Mr.V.Janakiramulu for R8
ORDER
When the civil revision petition was listed on 23.06.2025 and
25.06.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today (27.06.2025) under the
2/4
CRP(MD). No.221 of 2021
caption, 'for dismissal'.
27.06.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR TO 1.The 3rd Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli 2.VR Section Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4
CRP(MD). No.221 of 2021
M.DHANDAPANI,J
RR
ORDER IN CRP(MD) (NPD) No.221 of 2021
Date : 27/06/2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kajamalai
S. Jegannathan
P. Krishnamoorthy
Sheik Aleem Basha
Sheik Saleem Basha
Jahir Hussain
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
