Allowed¶25

Karpagam v. G.Kasturi Bai

Madras HC19 Aug 2025CRP(MD)/2043/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

C.R.P.(MD)No.2043 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD).No.11828 of 2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice M. Dhandapani; decided 19.08.2025; striking off of suit; cancellation of General Power of Attorney; GPA Document No. 3087 of 2022 dated 02.05.2022; cancellation deed Document No.8303 of 2022 dated 29.11.2022; O.S.No.361 of 2022; I.A.No.4 of 2023; III Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli; Article 227 of Constitution of India; liberty to plaintiff to work out remedy; petitioner Karpagam; respondent Kasthuri; Senior Counsel Mr.Veera Kathiravan (M/s.Veera Associates) for petitioner; Mr.K.S.Kathiravan for respondent.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition allowed; suit in O.S.No.361 of 2022 struck off; liberty granted to the respondent/plaintiff to work out her remedy with regard to the other reliefs, if so advised.

Karpagam Vs G.Kasturi Bai — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.2043 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED:19.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.2043 of 2025

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.(MD).No.11828 of 2025

Karpagam

...Petitioner

Vs.

Kasthuri ...Respondent

¶13

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in O.S.No.361of 2022 dated 19.10.2023 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.Veera Kathiravan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Veera Associates

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.K.S.Kathiravan

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶17

C.R.P.(MD)No.2043 of 2025

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in O.S.No.361of 2022 dated 19.10.2023 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli.

¶20

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondent / plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.361 of 2022 seeking a declaration declaring the General Power of Attorney said to have been executed by the petitioner and her brother in favour of the seventh defendant as Document No. 3087 of 2022 dated 02.05.2022 as null and void and for consequential reliefs. During the pendency of the suit, respondents 5 and 6 cancelled the power of attorney executed in favour of the seventh respondent and registered as Document No.8303 of 2022, on 29.11.2022 and produced the same before this Court.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that, in view of the subsequent cancellation, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶23

C.R.P.(MD)No.2043 of 2025

¶24

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed by striking off the

¶25

suit in O.S.No.361 of 2022. However, liberty is granted to the respondent / plaintiff to work out her remedy with regard to the other reliefs, if so advised.

¶26

19.08.2025

¶27

Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No TSG To

¶28