Disposed¶25

Kr.Ayyasamy v. N.Pandiyan

Madras HC23 Jul 2025CRP(MD)/1964/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; M.Dhandapani J.; C.R.P.(MD)No.1964 of 2025; Article 227 Constitution of India; supervisory jurisdiction; docket order dated 20.06.2025; I.A.No.2 of 2025 in O.S.No.112 of 2025; Sub Court, Devakottai; suit for specific performance; application restraining alienation of property; notice to respondent dispensed with; limited prayer; time-bound disposal of interlocutory application within three months; without going into merits; disposed of, no costs; dated 23.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Sub Court, Devakottai to dispose of I.A.No.2 of 2025 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; Civil Revision Petition disposed of with no costs. ¶25

Kr.Ayyasamy Vs N.Pandiyan — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.1964 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.07.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.1964 of 2025

¶7

1.KR.Ayyasamy 2.LN.Valliammal

¶8

... Petitiones

¶9

Vs.

¶10

N.Pandiyan ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the docket order dated 20.06.2025 in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in O.S.No.112 of 2025 on the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai and set aside the same and direct the Sub Court, Devakottai to hear and dispose of the same, within a time frame.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gurukrishna

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to call for the records relating to the docket order dated 20.06.2025 in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in O.S.No.112 of 2025 on the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai and set aside the same and direct the Sub Court, Devakottai to hear and dispose of the same, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

C.R.P.(MD)No.1964 of 2025

¶18

2.Since no adverse order is going to be passed as against the respondent, notice to the respondent is dispensed with.

¶19

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners filed a suit in O.S.No.112 of 2025 on the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai against the respondent seeking for specific performance and in the suit, he filed I.A.No.2 of 2025 for not to alienate the property. In the I.A., the learned Judge has ordered notice to the respondent and adjourned the matter on 03.09.2025. Challenging the docket order, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

¶20

4. Though the petitioner has come forward with a larger prayer, it is now submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners would be satisfied if a direction is given to the learned Sub Judge, Devakottai to dispose the I.A.No.2 of 2025.

¶21

5. Considering the limited request of the petitioner, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court directs the trial Court to dispose I.A.No.2 of 2025, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P.(MD)No.1964 of 2025

¶25

6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶26

23.07.2025

¶27

Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No am