Petitioners sought a direction to the Sub Court, Sattur, to expedite disposal of a pending suit for declaration and permanent injunction. The High Court declined to fix a time limit and directed expeditious disposal, disposing of the revision without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1917 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1917 of 2025
1.Jeyachandran
2.Vinoth 3.Kalaiselvi ...Petitioners
Vs.
Palpandiyan ...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the Sub Court, Sattur, to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.101 of 2025 within a time limit that may be fixed by this Court.
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Sub Court, Sattur,
to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.101 of 2024 within a time limit that may be fixed by this Court.
1/3
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1917 of 2025
learned Sub Judge, Sattur, against the respondents seeking declaration and permanent injunction.
16.07.2025
Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No TSG To 1.The Sub Court, Sattur.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2/3
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1917 of 2025
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
TSG
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1917 of 2025
16.07.2025
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to dispose of O.S.No.101 of 2024 within a fixed time frame.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeyachandran
Vinoth
Kalaiselvi
Palpandiyan
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
