A civil revision petition against an interim order in a Hindu Marriage Petition was dismissed as infructuous after the parties resumed living together, and the respondent undertook to withdraw the pending marriage petition. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD). No.58 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 15/07/2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
CRP (MD). No.58 of 2025
Muthumari ... Petitioner Vs Karuppasamy ... Respondent
PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 19.11.2024 in IA No.1 of 2024 in HMOP No.11 of 2024 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.N.Rajamohammed For Respondents : Mr.R.Maheswaran
ORDER
When the civil revision petition is taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer that has been sought has become infructuous inasmuch as, during the pendency of the Civil Revision Petition, the petitioner and the respondent are living
1/3
CRP(MD). No.58 of 2025
together. The said submission is recorded. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect.
15.07.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR
TO
1.The Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.
2.VR Section Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2/3
CRP(MD). No.58 of 2025
M.DHANDAPANI,J
RR
ORDER IN CRP(MD) (NPD) No.58 of 2025
Date : 15/07/2025
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muthumari
Karuppasamy
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
