The Commissioner, v. v.Geetha
Case brief
What is this about?
Short order dismissing a civil revision petition (Article 227) as infructuous; suit O.S.No.203 of 2019, Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam, disposed during pendency of the revision; endorsement by Standing Counsel B.Jameelarasu; dismissal with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition C.M.P.(MD)No.7225 of 2022 closed; parties: Commissioner, Municipal Office, Kumbakonam v. S.Vasudevan; no precedent relied upon; no adjudication on merits of striking off plaint.
What did the court decide?
Recording the learned Standing Counsel's submission, supported by his endorsement, that during the pendency of the Civil Revision Petition the suit itself was disposed of and nothing remained to be further considered, this Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous, with no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P.(MD)No.7225 of 2022).