Raja v. K. Rajakumari
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC, C.R.P.(PD) No.45 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.173 of 2024, S. Sounthar, J., 10.11.2025. Petitioners Raja, C.Vijayal, Pathinathan, Selvam, Anitha (counsel M/s.Karan and Uday) sought strike-off/quashal under Article 227 of respondent-wife K.Rajakumari's domestic violence complaint DVC.No.10 of 2022 before Judicial Magistrate-1, Tirupattur, Vellore District. CRP dismissed: alternative remedy before the Magistrate (raise maintainability/preliminary objections on shared household/domestic relationship per Full Bench Arul Daniel and Others v. Suganya, (2022) SCC Online Mad 5435; appeal under Section 29 of the DV Act) bars Article 227 exercise at threshold; Virudhunagar Nadargal Dharma Paripalana Shabha v. Tuticorin Educational Society (MANU/SC/1365/2019) relied on for near-total bar; Section 204 Cr.P.C./Section 12 D.V. Act discussion via Arul Daniel excerpt (Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal, (2004) 7 SCC 338; V.K. Vijayalekshmi Amma v. Bindu V., (2010) 87 AIC 367). Liberty to approach Magistrate; personal appearance dispensed with unless essentially required; no costs; CMP closed. Keywords: Domestic Violence Act, DVC, Article 227, maintainability, alternative remedy, shared household, strike off complaint, quash.