Dismissed

Nandagopal v. K.Mahendran

Madras HC11 Nov 2025CRL RC/1826/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and confirmed in appeal filed a criminal revision. Having not complied with the conditional order suspending his sentence, the court cancelled the suspension of sentence and directed him to surrender, dismissing the revision.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of sentence cancelled; petitioner directed to surrender before trial court; Criminal Revision Case dismissed.

Nandagopal Vs K.Mahendran — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL RC No. 1826 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11.11.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

CRL RC No. 1826 of 2025

Nandagopal

Petitioner

K.Mahendran

Respondent

CRL RC No. 1826 of 2025

¶13

PRAYER

¶14

To call for the records of the order dated 28.02.2025 passed by the learned I Addl. Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl. A.No. 382 of 2023 confirming the order passed by the learned FTC II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Allikulam in C.C.No. 2799 of 2018 dated 29.03.2023 and set aside the same.

¶15

For Petitioner: Ms. R.Kanisha for M/s. Nathan and Associates

¶16

For Respondent: Mr. S.Vennimalai

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CRL RC No. 1826 of 2025

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Challenging the impugned order passed by the I Addl. Sessions Judge,

¶22

City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl.A.No. 382 of 2023 confirming the order passed

¶23

by the FTC II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Allikulam in C.C.No. 2799 of

¶24

2018, the petitioner/accused preferred this Criminal Revision Petition.

¶25

The petitioner herein is the accused in C.C.No. 2799 of 2018 on the file of learned FTC II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Allikulam and he was found guilty of offence under Sec.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. He has been convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. Aggrieved by the same, he had filed an appeal in Crl.A.No. 382 oof

¶26

2023 before the I Addl. Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, which wass

¶27

also dismissed by confirming the findings of trial judge. Aggrieved by the same,

¶28

the present Criminal Revision case has been filed.

¶29

The learned counsel for respondent appeared and submitted that the

¶30

conditional order passed by this court has not been complied. The learned

¶31

counsel for petitioner seeks some more time and agreed to settle the issue.

¶32

2/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

CRL RC No. 1826 of 2025

¶35

Heard both sides.

¶36

On seeing the facts, as on date, this court had noticed that the petitioner

¶37

has not complied the conditional order passed by this court while suspending

¶38

the sentence as agreed by the petitioner. Therefore, on seeing the conduct of petitioner, the order of suspending the sentence passed by this court on 24.09.2025 is cancelled and the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.

¶39

11.11.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rpp

¶40

¶41

I Addl. Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶42

FTC II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶43

3/4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

CRL RC No. 1826 of 2025

¶46

T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

¶47

rpp

¶48

CRL RC No. 1826 of 2025

¶49

11.11.2025

¶50

4/4

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Nandagopal v. K.Mahendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandagopal v. K.Mahendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnan(Died) Vs S.Padmanaban(died)

Balu Vs Kalaivani

Karthik Kumar Sathivadivel Vs R.Chandran

Dalpat Singh Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police(L and O)

Sandhosh Murugesan Vs Saparnaa Rajendran

R.Backiam Vs M.Ganesh