Chandramohan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

The Inspector of Police, Vattathikottai Police Station, Thanjavur District. Crime No.374 of 2024. ... Respondent / Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS Act.

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.374 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for

¶17

the alleged offences under Section 25 (1)(b) of Arms Act 1959, in Crime No.374 of

¶18

2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/4

¶21

CRL OP(MD). No.378 of 2025

¶22

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of country made gun, which was used for hunting purposes. On seeing the police, the petitioner dropped the gun and escaped from the place.

¶23

3.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material records of the case.

¶24

4.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the gun has also been seized by the respondent police and also considering the fact that there are no previous cases against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶25

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶26

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

CRL OP(MD). No.378 of 2025

¶29

card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶30

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶31

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶32

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶33

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial

¶34

Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶35

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.

¶36

sd/09/01/2025 / TRUE COPY /

¶37

/01/2025

¶38

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶39

das

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis