Disposed

M.Prabakaran v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Madras HC19 Dec 2025CRL OP(MD)/23486/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought a direction restraining police from harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. The Additional Public Prosecutor stated that a case in Crime No.459 of 2025 had been registered by the second respondent police. The court recorded this and closed the petition with liberty to challenge.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; liberty to petitioner to challenge the registered case; no other relief granted.

M.Prabakaran Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23486 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23486 of 2025

M.Prabakaran

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its, The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District.

¶12

3.Chinnamayan

¶13

4.Sudha ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.S.Ravi, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23486 of 2025

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Seeking to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under

¶21

the guise of enquiry, this petition is filed.

¶22

2. Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for, notice to the respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with.

¶23

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the second respondent Police registered a case in Crime No.459 of 2025 on the file of the Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this case.

¶24

4.Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same.

¶25

19.12.2025

¶26

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsg

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23486 of 2025

¶30

TO :-

¶31

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶32

2.The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District.

¶33

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

3/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23486 of 2025

¶37

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶38

vsg

¶39

Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23486 of 2025

¶40

Dated 19.12.2025

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Prabakaran v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Prabakaran v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aseese Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Thamilarasi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Rethinam @ Rethinakumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Gomathi Vs The State of Tamilnadu

R.Sakunthala Vs The State of Tamilnadu

V.E.Siva Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by