Disposed

Aseese v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC18 Dec 2025CRL OP(MD)/23375/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a direction to complete investigation and file final report in a 2021 crime. Police reported the case closed as 'further action dropped'. Petitioner undertook to produce medical documents. Court directed reopening of the case and further proceedings in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent police to reopen the case and proceed per law once petitioner produces documents within two weeks.

Aseese Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23375 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23375 of 2025

Aseese

... Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its,

¶11

The Inspector of Police,

¶12

Devipattinam Police Station,

¶13

Ramanathapuram District.

¶14

(Crime No.05 of 2021) ... Respondent

¶15

PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondent to complete the investigation and file final report in Crime No.05 of 2021 as against all the named accused persons.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vishnuram For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar,

¶17

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23375 of 2025

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Seeking a direction to the respondent to complete the investigation and file final report in Crime No.05 of 2021 as against all the named accused persons, this petition is filed.

¶23

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions, submitted that after completion of investigation, the final report has been filed as 'further action dropped' .

¶24

3.However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not educated and he is a resident of Kerala. He is not conversant with the procedures of the Tamil Nadu Police and hence, he was unable to cooperate with the investigation. However, he is in possession of all the required medical documents and other details as sought by the respondent police, and he is ready to produce the same.

¶25

4.In view of the same, the respondent police is directed to reopen the case and the petitioner is directed to produce all necessary documents whatever

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23375 of 2025

¶29

is required by the police within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt

¶30

of copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the respondent police is

¶31

directed to proceed the case in the manner known to law.

¶32

5.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands

¶33

disposed of.

¶34

18.12.2025

¶35

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsg

¶36

TO :-

¶37

1.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶38

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶39

3/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23375 of 2025

¶42

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶43

vsg

¶44

Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23375 of 2025

¶45

Dated 18.12.2025

¶46

4/4

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Aseese v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aseese v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Mohamed Bilal Vs The State of Tamilnadu

C. Suresh Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

S.Ravindran Vs Arumugam

Thamilarasi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Rethinam @ Rethinakumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Alagar @ Alagarsamy Vs The State of Tamil Nadu