Disposed¶21

S.Ravindran v. Arumugam

Madras HC17 Dec 2025CONT P(MD)/1275/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Section 11; contempt petition closed on recording compliance; order dated 06.07.2023 in W.P.(MD) No. 16355/2023 already complied with; Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd.; Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees' Pension Fund Trust; contemnor Managing Director and Administrator; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; L. Victoria Gowri, J.; decision dated 17.12.2025; no punishment imposed.

What did the court decide?

None; no punishment imposed. The contempt petition was closed after recording that the order dated 06.07.2023 in W.P.(MD) No. 16355 of 2023 had already been complied with. ¶21

S.Ravindran Vs Arumugam — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 17.12.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶5

Cont.P.(MD)No.1275 of 2024 in

¶6

W.P(MD)No.16355 of 2023

¶7

S.Ravindran

¶8

...Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

Arumugam, The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd, Madurai Region, Madurai.

¶10

Bhama, The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai – 2. ...Contemnors/Respondents

¶11

...Contemnors/Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnors/ Respondents for willfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court dated 06.07.2023 in W.P. (MD) No. 16355/2023.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondents : M/s.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel for R1 Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel for R1

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Contempt Petition is filed to punish the Contemnors/ Respondents for willfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court dated 06.07.2023 in W.P.(MD) No. 16355/2023.

¶18

Heard, the learned Counsels on either side and carefully perused

¶19

the materials available on record.

¶20

When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was brought to the knowledge of this Court that the order passed by this Court dated 06.07.2023 in W.P.(MD)No.16355 of 2023, had already been complied with.

¶21