Disposed

Ragavinoth v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Patteeswaram

Madras HC4 Dec 2025CRL OP(MD)/22250/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application by accused in possession of 800 kgs of banned tobacco products. Court granted bail noting property recovered and period of incarceration, imposing bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, and a charitable deposit for school furniture.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered released on bail on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily reporting to police and Rs.5,000 deposit to school fund.

Ragavinoth Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.22250 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 04.12.2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.22250 of 2025

¶8

Ragavinoth ... Petitioner/Accused

¶9

The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Patteeswaram Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.294 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS

¶13

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.294 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

1/6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL OP(MD). No.22250 of 2025

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 275, 123 of BNS r/w Sections 7(1), 24(1) of Cigarette & Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, in Crime No.294 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶19

The prosecution's case is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 800 kgs of banned tobacco products. Hence, the complaint.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 28.10.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

¶21

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the property has been

¶22

2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

CRL OP(MD). No.22250 of 2025

¶25

recovered. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶26

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the

¶27

case and also the fact that the property has been recovered and also consideration the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

¶28

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Kumbakonam, and on further conditions that :-

¶29

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶30

[b] the petitioner shall make a non refundable deposit of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of The Head Master, Government Higher

¶31

3/6

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

CRL OP(MD). No.22250 of 2025

¶34

Secondary School, Odaipatty, Theni District, in SBI Account No.11268003539, IFSC No.SBIN0000764, State Bank of India, South Car Street, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. This fund shall be utilized for the purpose of purchasing furniture (Benches & Desks) for newly constructed class rooms under '' Namakku Name'' Scheme, without prejudice to his contentions and rights before the trial Court, and on such deposit being made, the learned Judicial Magistrate shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

¶35

(c ) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶36

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶37

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶38

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the

¶39

4/6

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

CRL OP(MD). No.22250 of 2025

¶42

conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶43

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J)

04.12.2025

msrm