Satham Hussain v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Gandhi Market
Bail – Petition under Sec.483 of BNSS – Theft of diamonds from the defacto complainant's pocket
Case brief
What is this about?
CRL OP(MD). No.22281 of 2025, Satham Hussain v. State of Tamilnadu (Gandhi Market Police Station, Trichy District, Crime No.391/2025), decided 04.12.2025 by Mrs. Justice S. Srimathy, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. Bail petition under Sec.483 of BNSS in a diamond-theft case; charges under Section 303(2) of BNS altered to Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of BNS; petitioner in judicial custody from 25.10.2025; parity argued via co-accused bail in Crl.OP(MD).No.20813 of 2025 (dated 20.11.2025); prosecution cited recovery of property and alleged attempt by A-1 to A-3 to sell the diamond. Bail granted on Rs.10,000/- bond with two sureties; conditions include daily police reporting at 10.30 a.m. for four weeks, no tampering, no absconding, breach clause per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560], and warning of fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Trichy, subject to conditions: photographs/left thumb impressions on surety bond with Aadhaar/bank pass book identity check; daily reporting before the respondent police at 10.30 a.m. for four weeks and thereafter as and when required; no tampering with evidence or witnesses; no absconding during investigation or trial; breach actionable by the Magistrate/Trial Court per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala; fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS if the accused absconds thereafter.