P.Marutheeswaran Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,The Inspector of Police, Pattiveeranpatti Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.217 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew Advocate.

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS

¶14

PRAYER :- For Bail in S.C.No.190 of 2024 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul in connection with Crime No.217 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

1/6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.18086 of 2025

¶18

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶19

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.06.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 352, 302 of IPC, S.C.No.190 of 2024 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul in connection with Crime No.217 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶20

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had attacked

¶21

the mother of the defacto complainant and, thereafter, she was taken to the hospital, where she died. Hence, the complaint.

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 04.06.2024. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

¶23

2/6

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

CRL OP(MD). No.18086 of 2025

¶26

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there

¶27

are 18 previous cases pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶28

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

¶29

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul District, and on further conditions that :-

¶30

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶31

[b] the petitioner shall do social service in the Government Hospital, Dindigul, for a period of one week and thereafter, the petitioner shall report before

¶32

3/6

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

CRL OP(MD). No.18086 of 2025

¶35

the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶36

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶37

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶38

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶39

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 16.10.2025

msrm

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

CRL OP(MD). No.18086 of 2025