Allowed

Alagarsamy v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC15 Oct 2025CRL MP(MD)/12496/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of a daily reporting condition imposed in a prior anticipatory/regular bail order. Both sides stated he had complied regularly. Court relaxed the condition, directing him to report as and when required for interrogation, and allowed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Condition of daily reporting relaxed; petitioner to report as and when required for interrogation.

Alagarsamy Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL MP(MD). No.12496 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 15/10/2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶7

CRL MP(MD). No.12496 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.8664 of 2025

¶8

Alagarsamy ... Petitioner/Accused

¶9

¶10

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Aundipatti Police Station, Cr. No. 181/2025, Theni District. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. C.Susi Kumar,

¶12

Advocate. For Respondent : Ms.M.Aasha, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.439(1)b of Cr.P.C

¶14

PRAYER :-

¶15

To relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP. (MD).No. 8664/2025 dated 24.06.2025 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders and thus render justice.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CRL MP(MD). No.12496 of 2025

¶20

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in CRL OP(MD). No.8664 of 2025 dated 24.06.2025.

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court regularly and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted

¶23

that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶24

Considering the nature of offence, the condition imposed by this Court in CRL OP(MD). No.8664 of 2025 dated 24.06.2025, is relaxed and the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶25

TRP (S S Y J) 15.10.2025 TO

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

CRL MP(MD). No.12496 of 2025

¶29

The Inspector of Police, Aundipatti Police Station, Theni District..

¶30

The Judicial Magistrate,, Andipatti.

¶31

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Theni..

¶32

The Officer Incharge,, The Chairman/District Collector, District Mineral Foundation Trust Theni.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

CRL MP(MD). No.12496 of 2025

¶36

S.SRIMATHY,J

¶37

TRP

¶38

ORDER in CRL MP(MD) No.12496 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.8664 of 2025

¶39

Date : 15/10/2025

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Alagarsamy v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alagarsamy v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babu Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

Muthumari @ Muthumariappan Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Through, The Inspector of Police

Gopalakrishnan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Sudarsan Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Vijay Vengadesh @ Viji Venkatesh Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

D. Sendukodi Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by