D. Sendukodi Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By The Inspector of Police, Chekkanoorani Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.272 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran, Advocate.

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS

¶14

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.272 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

1/6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.17756 of 2025

¶18

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶19

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b) and 351(1) of BNS and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, in Crime No.272 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶20

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused persons have trespassed into the property of the defacto complainant abused him in filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they are no way connected with the alleged occurrence as stated by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seek anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶22

2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

CRL OP(MD). No.17756 of 2025

¶25

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted that there was another FIR was registered against the accused persons. He further submitted that there are four previous cases pending against the 1^st petitioner and one previous case pending against the 2^nd petitioner and no previous case pending agains the 3^rd petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶26

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that no one was sustained injuries, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶27

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Usilampatti, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to

¶28

3/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRL OP(MD). No.17756 of 2025

¶31

arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Usilampatti, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶32

(a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶33

(b ) the 2^nd petitioner shall stay at Trichy and report before the Inspector of Police, Cantonment Police Station, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation before the respondent. The petitioners 1 and 3 shall report before the respondent police as and when require for interrogation;

¶34

(c) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶35

(d) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶36

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate

¶37

4/6

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

CRL OP(MD). No.17756 of 2025

¶40

action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560] and;

¶41

(f) if the accused/petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.

(S S Y J) 15.10.2025

msrm

To