Disposed¶24

Amutha v. The Superenent of Police

Madras HC24 Jun 2025CRL OP/18070/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl.O.P.No.18070 of 2025, Madras High Court, decided 24.06.2025 by D. Bharatha Chakravarthy J. Section 482 CrPC petition by Amutha against the Superintendent of Police and the Inspector of Police, Crime Branch II, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Perambalur, seeking that police not harass her in connection with a civil dispute following a complaint by Deivagani. Court directed petitioner to attend the enquiry on 30.06.2025, police to complete the enquiry, and no harassment except through summons for enquiry; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with directions: petitioner to appear for the enquiry on 30.06.2025; respondent police to complete the enquiry; petitioner not to be harassed except through summons for the enquiry. ¶24

Amutha Vs The Superenent of Police — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.18070 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 24.06.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.18070 of 2025

Amutha

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Perambalur - 621212.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Dist., Crime Branch II, Anti - Land Grabbing Spl Cell, Perambalur - 621212. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., pleased to issue a direction to the respondents, particularly the second respondent, not to harass or interfere in any manner with the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner in connection with the above purely civil dispute, and further direct the police not to harass or disturb the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Deepak Raj For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.18070 of 2025

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This petition is filed with a prayer not to harass the petitioner.

¶19

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government

¶20

Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that, based

¶21

on a complaint by one Deivagani, the petitioner has been specifically summoned to be present for a preliminary enquiry.

¶22

In view thereof, let the petitioner be present for the enquiry on

¶23

30.06.2025. The respondent police shall complete the enquiry. Except through summons for enquiry, the petitioner shall not be harassed in any other manner.

¶24