Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Reegan Prabu Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2025
Reegan Prabu Vs The State of TamilnaduReegan Prabu v. The State of Tamilnadu

Allowed¶25-26

Reegan Prabu v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC7 Apr 2025CRL MP(MD)/4583/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Relaxation of condition No.7(viii); CRL MP(MD) No.4583 of 2025; Crl.O.P(MD) No.4106 of 2025; order dated 05.03.2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; R.SAKTHIVEL; Reegan Prabu; Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station, Pudukkottai District; Cr. No. 47 of 2025; D.Rameshkumar; S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl. Side); petition allowed; other conditions hold good.

What did the court decide?

Full relaxation of condition No.7(viii) imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 (order dated 05.03.2025); the other conditions continue to hold good. ¶25-26

Why is it important?

In view of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitting that the petitioner had been complying with the condition regularly without any violation, the Court was inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in the said Criminal Original Petition. ¶23-24

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Full relaxation of condition No.7(viii) imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 (order dated 05.03.2025); the other conditions continue to hold good.

Issue for consideration

Whether the condition imposed on the petitioner in the order dated 05.03.2025 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 should be relaxed.

Court's answer

In view of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitting that the petitioner had been complying with the condition regularly without any violation, the Court was inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in the said Criminal Original Petition.

Ratio / Principle

The petition is allowed; condition No.7(viii) imposed in the order dated 05.03.2025 passed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 is fully relaxed, and the other conditions shall hold good.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, order dated 07-04-2025 (R.SAKTHIVEL, J.) in CRL MP(MD) No.4583 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4106 of 2025: Petitioner Reegan Prabu sought relaxation of a condition imposed by this Court's order dated 05.03.2025 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.4106 of 2025 (arising from Cr. No. 47 of 2025, Annavasal Police Station, Pudukkottai District). With the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) confirming that the petitioner had been complying with the condition regularly without any violation, the Court allowed the petition and fully relaxed condition No.7(viii); all other conditions were left undisturbed.

A

CRL MP(MD) NO.4583 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-04-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

CRL MP(MD) NO.4583 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.4106 of 2025

Reegan Prabu,

Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station Pudukkottai District. (Cr. No. 47 of 2025)

Respondent (s)

For Petitioner(s):Mr.D.Rameshkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.S.Manoj

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

This Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD). No.4106 of 2025, dated 05.03.2025.

Mr.D.Rameshkumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that

the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

Mr.S.S.Manoj, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the

1/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL MP(MD) NO.4583 of 2025

respondent- Police submits that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly without any violation.

In view of the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.

Side), this Court is inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in the said Criminal Original Petition.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed and condition No.7(viii) imposed by this

Court in the order dated 05.03.2025 passed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025, is hereby fully relaxed. The other conditions shall hold good.

sd/-

07/04/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/04/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I/ II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

VSG

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ILLUPPUR, PUDUKOTTAI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL MP(MD) NO.4583 of 2025

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4583 of 2025 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4106 of 2025 Date :07/04/2025

PP//SAR-(15.04.2025) 3P 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

3/3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the condition imposed on the petitioner in the order dated 05.03.2025 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 should be relaxed.¶15
The court held
In view of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitting that the petitioner had been complying with the condition regularly without any violation, the Court was inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in the said Criminal Original Petition.ratio¶23-24

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order of this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 dated 05.03.2025 imposing conditions on the petitioner, including condition No.7(viii), the relaxation of which was sought in this petition.¶15
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court · 05.03.2025
Prior proceeding
Underlying criminal case registered as Cr. No. 47 of 2025 with the Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station, Pudukkottai District.¶10
Prior proceeding
Earlier order dated 05.03.2025 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 by this Court imposed conditions on the petitioner, including condition No.7(viii).¶15

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Reegan Prabu¶7-8
Mr.D.Rameshkumar
respondent
The Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station Pudukkottai District. (Cr. No. 47 of 2025)¶10-11
Mr.S.S.Manoj

Coram

AI extract

R.SAKTHIVELauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 7 Apr 2025 · April
Registered: 3 Apr 2025
Case no.: CRL MP(MD)/4583/2025
CNR: HCMD010423552025
Bench: R.sakthivel
Disposal: ORDERED
Case type: CRL MP(MD)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.sakthivel

Alagu Pandi Vs The State of Tamilnadu
4 Apr 2025
Pethanan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
4 Apr 2025
Thangaperuma Vs The State of Tamilnadu
4 Apr 2025
Palanivel @ Bala Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
7 Apr 2025
Rajesh Vs The State of Tamilnadu
7 Apr 2025
K.Vanniyaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu
7 Apr 2025

Cite this judgement

Reegan Prabu v. The State of Tamilnadu, CRL MP(MD)/4583/2025 (MAD), decided on 7 April 2025.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history3

Order of this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 dated 05.03.2025 imposing conditions on the petitioner, including condition No.7(viii), the relaxation of which was sought in this petition.Madurai Bench of Madras High Court · 05.03.2025
Underlying criminal case registered as Cr. No. 47 of 2025 with the Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
Earlier order dated 05.03.2025 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4106 of 2025 by this Court imposed conditions on the petitioner, including condition No.7(viii).

View full history

Bench / Coram

R.SAKTHIVEL

Parties & counsel