Dismissed¶21

Ramaraj v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Oct 2025CRL MP(MD)/14705/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ramaraj v. State through the Inspector of Police, Palani All Women Police Station, Dindigul (Crime No.11 of 2020) and Murugavel; Crl.MP(MD)No.14705 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.430 of 2025; impleadment of proposed second respondent in Crl.M.P(MD)No.12416 of 2025 and Crl.A(MD)No.430 of 2023; Section 528 BNSS; petition not pressed on counsel's endorsement; dismissed as not pressed; Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; single judge K. Murali Shankar; dated 16.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is not pressing the petition, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as not pressed. ¶21

Ramaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.MP(MD)No.14705 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.430 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.10.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14705 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.430 of 2025

Ramaraj

: Petitioner

Vs.

1.State through the Inspector of Police, Palani All Women Police Station, Dindigul. Crime No.11 of 2020.

¶11

2.Murugavel

¶12

: Respondents

¶13

Prayer : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to implead the proposed second respondent as the second respondent in Crl.M.P(MD)No.12416 of 2025 and Crl.A(MD)No.430 of 2023.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vivek, For Respondent : Mr.M.Vaikkak Karunanithi,, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.MP(MD)No.14705 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.430 of 2025

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to implead the proposed second respondent as the second respondent in Crl.M.P(MD)No.12416 of 2025 and Crl.A(MD)No.430 of 2023.

¶20

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is not pressing the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶21