Allowed

B. Ravichandran v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC16 Oct 2025CRL MP(MD)/13233/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 528 BNSS sought relaxation of a condition imposed in an earlier order in the pending criminal appeal. Counsel for both sides agreed the petitioner was complying with the condition regularly. The Court modified it to require appearance before the II Additional District Judge (CBI Cases), Madurai, on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m.

What did the court decide?

Condition modified to monthly appearance before II Additional District Judge (CBI Cases), Madurai, first working day of every month, 10.30 a.m.

B. Ravichandran Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.13233 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.781 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16-10-2025

¶4

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.13233 of 2025 in CRL A(MD) No.781 of 2023

B.Ravichandran

: Petitioner

State of Tamil Nadu rep by The Inspector of Police, SPE:CBI:ACB, Chennai, (RC MAI 2015(A) 0002) : Responden

¶10

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.528 of BNSS.

¶11

PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner by this Court in its order, dated 01.08.2025, made in Crl.M.P(MD)No.9649 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.781 of 2025.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabhu,

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.C.Muthu Saravanam, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases.

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL MP(MD) No.13233 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.781 of 2023

¶17

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶18

The above petition has been filed seeking orders to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner by this Court in its order, dated 01.08.2025, made in Crl.M.P(MD)No.9649 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.781 of 2025.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State.

¶20

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would also concede the same.

¶21

Considering the above, the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P(MD)No.9649 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.781 of 2025, dated 01.08.2025, is modified to the effect that the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned II Additional District Judge (CBI Cases), Madurai, on the first working day of every Month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

CRL MP(MD) No.13233 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.781 of 2023

¶25

Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

16-10-2025

das

1.The II Additional District Judge (CBI Cases), Madurai.

¶30

2.The Sessions Judge, CBI Court, Tiruchirappalli.

¶31

3.The Inspector of Police, SPE:CBI:ACB, Chennai, (RC MAI 2015(A) 0002)

¶32

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

CRL MP(MD) No.13233 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.781 of 2023

¶36

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J

¶37

das

¶38

CRL MP(MD) No.13233 of 2025 in CRL A(MD) No.781 of 2023

¶39

16.10.2025

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

B. Ravichandran v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Ravichandran v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baskar Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Deputy Superintendent of Police

Subash Chandar @ Subash Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Prabakaran Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

S.Jayalakshmi Vs Sujatha

Shanmugaiah Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Ramaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police