Mahesh Mathurdas Karani Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Mahesh Mathurdas Karani Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023 in

Crl.O.P.No.4949 of 2023

Mahesh Mathurdas Karani ... Petitioner Vs.

State Represented by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nilgiris District.

M.Boobathy ... Respondents

For Petitioner : M/s.T.R.Ravi For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking cancellation of the bail granted to

the 2nd respondent in Crl.O.P.No.4949 of 2023 dated 16.03.2023.

1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/defacto complainant

submitted that while this Court granted bail, the petitioner had given an undertaking that he will not alienate or create encumbrance over the

property. Now, the petitioner had attempted to alienate the property and since

the same is a violation of the condition, the petitioner prays for canceling the

bail to the 2nd respondent/ bail petitioner.

The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted that the case is

at the stage of trial and cancellation of bail is not necessary at this stage.

I have considered the submissions of the both side. This Court while

granting bail to the 2nd respondent has recorded that the petitioner is ready to

file an affidavit of undertaking that he will not alienate or create encumbrance

over the property. However, this Court has not imposed any condition baning

alienation or encumbrance Further, so far no documents is produced before

2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023

this Court to show that the petitioner has alienated the property and only on

assumption, this petition has been filed. Further, considering present stage of

trial, this Court is not inclined to cancel the bail granted to the 2nd respondent

herein.

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous petition is

dismissed.

19.11.2025

sma

To

Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nilgiris District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023 K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023

5/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.6140 of 2023

19.11.2025

6/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis