Disposed¶30

R. Sekar v. State by the Inspector of

Madras HC7 Oct 2025CRL A/28/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Correction of prayer; Criminal Appeal No.769 of 2016; Section 378 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; C.C.No.5 of 2009; II Additional District Judge for CBI Cases, Coimbatore; judgment dated 30.12.2015; CBI ACB Chennai; R.C.49(A)/2008; Charge Sheet No.1/KSN/2009; Registry direction; For Being Mentioned; Madras High Court; D. Bharatha Chakravarthy; appellants R.Sekar and R.Selvaraju; respondent A.Selvaraju.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Registry to correct the prayer in Criminal Appeal No.769 of 2016 as set out in the order and to issue the corrected order copy to the parties. ¶30

R. Sekar Vs State by the Inspector of — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Criminal Appeal Nos.28, 32 and 769 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 28.10.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

Criminal Appeal Nos.28, 32 and 769 of 2016

¶7

R.Sekar

¶8

... Appellant/Accused No.2 in Crl.A.No.28 of 2016

¶9

R.Selvaraju

¶10

... Appellant/Accused No.1 in Crl.A.No.32 of 2016

¶11

State Represented by CBI, ACB, Chennai

¶12

... Appellant/Complainant in Crl.A.No.769 of 2016

¶13

Vs.

¶14

State by The Inspector of Police, SPE/CBI/ACB Chennai. Charge Sheet No.1/KSN/2009 R.C.49(A)/2008/SPE/CBI/ACB Chennai.

¶15

A.Selvaraju

¶16

... Respondent/Complainant in both in Crl.A.Nos.28 and 32 of 2016 ... Respondent/Accused in Crl.A.No.769 of 2016

¶17

Page No.1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Criminal Appeal Nos.28, 32 and 769 of 2016

¶20

For the Appellant in Crl.A.No.28 of 2016	: Mr.K.Shankar
For the Appellant in Crl.A.No.32 of 2016	: Mr.R. Ezhilarasan
For the Appellant in Crl.A.No.769 of 2016	: Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor (CBI cases)
For the Respondent in Crl.A.Nos.28 and 32 of 2016	: Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor (CBI cases)
For the Respondent in Crl.A.No.769 of 2016	: Mr.R.Ezhilarasan

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Today, the matter is listed under the caption “For Being Mentioned”.

¶23

It is stated that the prayer in Criminal Appeal No.769 of 2016 was not

¶24

mentioned as exactly as contained in the said appeal, accordingly, the Registry shall correct the same as follows:

¶25

“Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Code of

¶26

Criminal Procedure, 1973, to set aside the judgment dated 30.12.2015 pronounced by the II Additional District Judge for CBI Cases, Coimbatore in C.C.No.5 of 2009.”

¶27

Page No.2 of 4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Criminal Appeal Nos.28, 32 and 769 of 2016

¶30