M.Raja Vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by, the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Prayer : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002, to set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.89 of 2025 in Spl.S.C.No.3 of 2022 dated 25.02.2025 on the file of the Special Court under Prevention of Terrorism Act, Poonamalle, chennai and enlarge the appellant on bail.

¶13

¶14

For Appellant : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________Page 1/6

¶16

________Page 1/6

¶17

Crl.A. No.266 of 2025

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

(delivered by N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.)

¶20

The present criminal appeal is filed challenging the order of the Special

¶21

Court under Prevention of Terrorism Act, Poonamallee, Chennai, dated 25.02.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.89 of 2025 in Spl.SC No.3 of 2022.

¶22

The appellant/accused No.7 was charged for the offence under

¶23

Sections 3(5) and 4(b) of POTA 2022, 120B, 148 IPC, 307, 333, 353 r/w Section 149 IPC. The trial was pending before the Special Court. The appellant was arrested on 24.11.2002 and was set at liberty on bail by this Hon'ble Court by its order dated 22.02.2007. During the pendency of the on going trial, the appellant could not appear before the Special Court on 13.11.2024, wherein the Special Court had issued a Non Bailable Warrant against the appellant. On the same day, the appellant filed a petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C. However, the Special Court had dismissed the same and remanded the appellant/accused to judicial custody on 28.01.2025. Consequently, a petition to enlarge the appellant on bail was filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C and the same was dismissed on 25.02.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.89 of 2025. Challenging the said order, the present appeal is filed.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________Page 2/6

¶25

________Page 2/6

¶26

Crl.A. No.266 of 2025

¶27

Admittedly, the appellant/accused was under incarceration for about four years and thereafter bail was granted. Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would contend that, when an accused could not appear before the court and an application under Section 317 of Cr.P.C is filed, the normal practice of the court is to accept the application and grant permission. Per contra, the court had dismissed the application and has issued a Non Bailable Warrant and remanded the appellant to judicial custody on 28.01.2025 and from thereafter, the accused is in jail.

¶28

There is substantial force in the argument advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant contending that when a Non Bailable Warrant was issued on 13.11.2024, despite an application was filed under Section 317 Cr.P.C., the trial Court had dismissed the same. The absence of the appellant/accused was bona fide by filing the application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and he has subjected himself before the Special Court to demonstrate his bona fides to show before the Special Court that he is appearing before the special court.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________Page 3/6

¶30

________Page 3/6

¶31

Crl.A. No.266 of 2025

¶32

In view of the same, this appeal is allowed and the order of the Special Court under Prevention of Terrorism Act, Poonamallee, Chennai, dated 25.02.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.89 of 2025 in Spl.S.C. No.3/2022, is set aside. Consequently, the appellant shall be released on bail on condition that he shall furnish two sureties on execution of a bond to the value of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only), with a further condition that the appellant shall appear before the Special Court under Prevention of Terrorism Act, Poonamallee, Chennai, on all hearing dates.

¶33

[M.S.R., J.] [N.S., J.] 27.03.2025

¶34

Note:Issue order copy on 28.03.2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu

¶35

To

¶36