Dismissed¶25

Raji v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC26 Mar 2025HCP/565/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court H.C.P.No.565 of 2025 (26.03.2025), Raji v. State (Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai District; Inspector of Police, Poraiyur Police Station) and Mohanakannan. Article 226 writ of habeas corpus to produce petitioner's daughter Shiyamaladevi from alleged illegal custody of 3rd respondent. Counsel (Mr.C.T.Saravanan) withdrew with endorsement; petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs. Bench: M.S. Ramesh and N. Senthilkumar, JJ. No precedent discussed; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which the Court took on record. ¶22

Raji Vs the State Rep. by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

H.C.P.No.565 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.03.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR

H.C.P.No.565 of 2025

Raji

... Petitioner

Vs.

The State rep. by, 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai District.

¶13

2.The Inspector of Police, Poraiyur Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.

¶14

3.Mohanakannan ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the 2 nd respondent to produce the Shiyamaladevi, D/o.Raji, aged about 23 years, daughter of the petitioner, from the illegal custody of the 3 rd respondent herein before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

H.C.P.No.565 of 2025

¶19

F or Petitioner : Mr.C.T.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J. )

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶23

2 . In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

¶24

counsel for the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as

¶25

withdrawn. No costs.

¶26

[M.S.R, J.] [N.S, J.] 26.03.2025

¶27

Index: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes/No

¶28

Sni