S.Gopal v. Ranjith Sing
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a prior writ order was closed upon the respondent authorities demonstrating that they had passed fresh proceedings considering the petitioner's representation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P(MD)No.963 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.04.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
CONT.P(MD)No.963 of 2025
S.Gopal
... Petitioner
vs.
- Mr.Ranjith Singh,
The District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Theni District, Theni.
- Mr.Rajath Beeton, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was willful disobedience of the order dated 11.11.2024 in W.P(MD)No.26758 of 2024?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Gopal
- respondent
Mr.Ranjith Singh, The District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Theni District
- respondent
Mr.Rajath Beeton, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam
- respondent
Mr.Kadhar Shereef, The Tahsildar, Andipatty Taluk
- respondent
Mrs.Vinitha, The Executive Officer, Andipatty Town Panchayat
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court