Allowed¶28

S.Bhuvaneswari v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC3 Apr 2025CMP(MD)/5930/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

condonation of delay; 68 days; CMP(MD) No.5930 of 2025; WA(MD)No.SR 25293 of 2024; S.Bhuvaneswari; District Revenue Officer Karur; Joint Commissioner HR&CE Pichandarkovil Tiruchirappalli; Assistant Commissioner HR&CE Karur; Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments; E.K.Kumaresan; S.S.Madhavan Additional Government Pleader; costs Rs.500/-; E-Seva Kendra Porta Cabins; automatic dismissal on default; J.Nisha Banu; S.Srimathy; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; order dated 03/04/2025.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 68 days in filing WA(MD)No.SR 25293 of 2024 condoned on payment of Rs.500/- costs to the E-Seva Kendra Porta Cabins attached to the Madurai Bench; non-payment results in automatic dismissal of the petition. ¶28

S.Bhuvaneswari Vs The District Revenue Officer — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD) No.5930 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Third day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

¶6

and

¶7

The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶8

CMP(MD) No.5930 of 2025

¶9

¶10

WA(MD)No.SR 25293 of 2024

¶11

S.BHUVANESWARI ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶12

¶13

1 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER

¶14

KARUR DISTRICT, KARUR.

¶15

2 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER,

¶16

HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, PICHANDARKOVIL, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

¶17

3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, NEARBY NIRMALA HOSPITAL, KARUR-639001 ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.E.K.KUMARESAN, Advocate

¶19

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.MADHAVAN, Additional Government Pleader

¶20

1/3

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

ORDER

¶23

CMP(MD) No.5930 of 2025

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.)

¶25

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 68 days in filing the above Writ Appeal.

¶26

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶27

3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and taking into consideration that the respondents have got no objection to condone the delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay of 68 days, however, on payment of costs.

¶28

4.Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the delay is condoned on payment of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to E-Seva Kendra Porta Cabins attached to this Bench [Account No:7026895311, IFSC Code:IDIB000H040, Indian Bank, High Court Branch, Madurai] forthwith on receipt of a copy of this order, failing which this

¶29

petition will be dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶30

sd/03/04/2025 / TRUE COPY /

¶31

/04/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III / IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

2/3

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

CMP(MD) No.5930 of 2025

¶35

¶36

¶37

THE OFFICER INCHARGE/REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL), SPECIAL COSTS, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. (FOR E-SEVA KENDRA PORTA CABINS)

¶38

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.5930 of 2025 in WA(MD)No.SR 25293 of 2024 Date :03/04/2025

¶39

SS/SAR- /09/04/2025/ 3P/2C

¶40

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶41

3/3

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Bhuvaneswari v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Bhuvaneswari v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Naganathan Vs The District Collector

Santhosh S K Ram Vs The District Collector

D.Thirugnasampantham Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its

Selastin Selvakumar Vs The District Collector

Omar Iqbal Vs The Secretary

N. Panneer Selvam Vs The District Collector