Disposed¶15

M/s.Tripower Properties Limited v. Dinesh Ponraj Oliver

Madras HC1 Jul 2025CONT P(MD)/2525/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tripower Properties Ltd. v. Inspector General of Registration & Anr., CONT.P.(MD)No.2525 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.24736 of 2023, Madras High Court (Madurai Bench), decided 01.07.2025 by G.R.Swaminathan, J. Contempt petition for non-compliance of writ order dated 19.10.2023; compliance noted (sale certificate registered under Section 89(4) Registration Act, 1908); petition closed with respondents' submission on pending SLP recorded.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed after noting that the order in W.P.(MD)No.24736 of 2023 has been complied with and recording the respondents' submission regarding the SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. ¶15

M/s.Tripower Properties Limited Vs Dinesh Ponraj Oliver — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2525 OF 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 01.07.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN CONT.P.(MD)No.2525 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.24736 of 2023

¶6

M/s.Tripower Properties Ltd., Rep. by its Director, No.2/569, Sandy Nook, Singaravelar 1^st Main Road, Chinna Neelangarai, Chennai – 600 0115. ... Petitioner / Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Thiru.Dinesh Ponraj Oliver, Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

¶9

Thiru.S.Abdul Siddiq, Sub Registrar, Melur (West) Sub Registrar Office, Melur, Madurai District. ... Respondents/Contemnors

¶10

Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the respondents for non-compliance of the order dated 19.10.2023 passed in W.P. (MD)No.24736 of 2023.

¶11

1/4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2525 OF 2023 For Petitioner : Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.Veera Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General, assisted by, Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Special Government Pleader. * * *

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents informed the Court that the order passed by this court has since been complied with. The petition mentioned sale certificate has been filed under Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908 as document No.2 of 2025(Book No.1). The learned Additional Advocate General further submits that SLP filed by the State against W.A.(MD)No.2078 of 2023 had suffered dismissal for default only and that the present action in complying with the order of this Court is subject to the outcome of the proceedings before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The said submission is placed on record. This contempt petition is closed.

¶16

01.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 2/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18