Contempt petition alleging disobedience of a High Court writ order. Both counsel reported that the order had been complied with; the court recorded the compliance and closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.1901 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
Cont.P.(MD).No.1901 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.4295 of 2025
P.Kuppusamy
... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 to punish the contemnors/2 and 3 respondents for their willful and wanton disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble High Court dated 19.02.2025 made in W.P.(MD).No.4295 of 2025 under Contempt of Courts Act.
1/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.1901 of 2025
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Bhuvaneswari For Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezian Government Advocate
ORDER
The present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of
the order of this Court dated 19.02.2025 made in W.P.(MD).No.4295 of 2025
18.08.2025
NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm
2/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.1901 of 2025
To
3/4
Cont.P.(MD)No.1901 of 2025
S.SOUNTHAR , J.
rgm
Cont.P.(MD).No.1901 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.4295 of 2025
18.08.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Kuppusamy
Sivakumar, Assistant Director of Survey, Survey and Land Records Department, District Collector Office, Dindigul District
Babu, The Tahsildar, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
