Contempt petition alleging disobedience of a writ order against the Passport Officer. Both counsel represented that the writ order dated 26.11.2024 had already been complied with. The court recorded the compliance and closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) No.1058 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.04.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Cont.P (MD) No.1058 of 2025 in W.P.(MD).No.28182 of 2024
K.Nalini ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.B.Vasanthan, I.F.S., The Passport Officer, The Regional Passport Office, Madurai, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. ... Contemnor / respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondent for his wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court in WP.(MD).No.28182 of 2024 dated 26.11.2024.
For Petitioner : Mr.E.K.Kumaresan
For Respondent : Mr.K.Govindarajan Deputy Solicitor General of India
1/4
Cont.P.(MD) No.1058 of 2025
O R D E R
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, it is represented by the Counsel on either side that the order passed by this court in W.P(MD).No. 28182 of 2024 dated 26.11.2024, has already been complied with by the respondent.
25.04.2025
NCC : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No jbr
2/4
Cont.P.(MD) No.1058 of 2025
To
Mr.B.Vasanthan, I.F.S., The Passport Officer, The Regional Passport Office, Madurai, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002.
3/4
Cont.P.(MD) No.1058 of 2025
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
jbr
Cont.P (MD) No.1058 of 2025 in W.P.(MD).No.28182 of 2024
25.04.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Nalini
B.Vasanthan, I.F.S., The Passport Officer
L.Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
